A reflection from
Mt 5, 20-26
Matthew presents Jesus
as the "new Moses"
and all that refers to Christ brings the brand of novelty:
the Mount of Beatitudes
is the new Mount Sinai;
the Beatitudes are the New Discourse on the
Commandments; the brotherhood
is the new justice, which overcomes the righteousness of the Scribes
and Pharisees; his body is the new
temple. In the speech of Jesus there
is not a rupture with what the
ancients used to think, but a continuity,
interpreting in a new way the true
meaning of what was said. Jesus’ aim is to recover the original plan
of God. Until the
appearance of Jesus, the revealing
experience as “word of God” was related to the writings of the Old Testament. All
attentions are turned to them,
established as norm of life. With Jesus, the things begin to change. The early Christians can even make reference to the
ancient writings, but are the teachings of Jesus, which
subsequently become norm even for the
Old Testament itself.
Even though Jesus
has authority to speak, fulfilling with what was revealed before, he does not despise the writings of the Old Testament; on
the contrary, he encourages their appreciation and fulfilment (Mt 5,
17-20). But the
hardness of hearts and the arbitrary
interpretations of the original
Law led Jesus to state: "However I say to you..." From then matter the explanation that he gives about
what was said. In Matthew,
justice means God's will. And God's will is
that the people should be generous, going
further of what has been established by
law, concerning charity and
reconciliation. Gradually the
disciples of Jesus were realizing that Jesus’ desire was to establish a new relationship with God and with others. The benchmark for this
could not be the human justice - so limited and
sometimes so unfair on its criteria - but
in the divine justice based on love
and mercy.
In Jesus everything
becomes new, and to manifest
this novelty to the world, the new disciples of Jesus
need more fraternity
than physical spaces sumptuous. The true worship
to God happens in relationship with others. I cannot live
as if the other people do not exist. It is necessary to stay vigilant because perhaps we are being homicidal and
we don’t perceive. In this
context, I don’t need to get
a gun to kill another. I can kill him through the
relationship with him. The anger
that we have for someone is a real homicide.
The contempt is the beginning. The gossip against someone
takes his dignity. It is not
possible to relate well with God while we don’t
reconcile ourselves with whom we have offended or with who offended us. The lack of reconciliation
between members goes little by little decreeing
the death of the community. I
shouldn’t expect that the other comes
to make up with me; I am the one who should take the initiative. I do not choose the people
with whom I should live; simply get them as
gifts of God's grace. The
Tenderness, the fraternal correction and reconciliation are basic conditions
that the people expect from me so that
they should not look for it out what they don’t find with the community.
Pe. Degaaxé
Revision: Brother Cipriano
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário